Lost and Found
Bava Metzia 28
Today’s post is not about the current daf but it is topical
nonetheless. In Jerusalem last week the City of David held its annual
archaeological conference. This is a fabulous event for Bible scholars, tour
guides, archaeologists and anyone interested in the intersection of history and
archaeology. The speakers at the conference present the latest discoveries made
in the City of David and there are tours of the newest sites, most not yet open
to the public.
This year’s “it” discovery was something called the
podium. This is a pyramid-shaped, stepped structure found on the side of the
monumental first century CE street that led from the Siloam (Shiloach) pool up
to the area below the Temple Mount. The archaeologists who exposed it are Joe
Uziel and Nachson Szanton.
The road was the main street that pilgrims would use when
they came to Jerusalem. First they would go to the pool and get water and hear
the latest news, then they would make their way up the road to the shops and
mikvaot that stood at the foot of the Western Wall. After that, they would
ascend to the Temple Mount itself, either by way of Robinson’s Arch or through
the Hulda Gates.
The street was carefully constructed, with broad steps to
make the ascent easier. Based on the coins found there, it dates to the first
decades of the first century and therefore was only used for a short time
before the Temple was destroyed. But in that half-century, it was the most
important street in the city, perhaps in the country. During pilgrimage season
thousands would visit it daily.
The podium stands at a point between steps where it can
be easily seen from further up the street or further downhill. It seems not to
be the entrance to a building as no doorway was found nearby. Uziel and Szanton suggest several
possibilities for the podium’s use. Perhaps it was a place for speeches, a Hyde
Park for Jerusalem; or for government sponsored announcements. Perhaps
auctions, maybe even of slaves, were held there. To daf yomi learners, their
most intriguing suggestion may be that it was an אבן הטוען, a stone for declaring lost objects.
The commandment of returning a lost object, השבת אבידה , took on special significance in Second
Temple Jerusalem. The Gemara in Bava Metzia 28 explains that when the Temple
was standing, a lost object needed to be announced in Jerusalem over the course of three holiday until it was considered ownerless. Where was that announcement made? At a stone
called the stone of claims:
אבן טוען היתה בירושלים,
כל מי שאבדה לו אבידה נפנה לשם, וכל מי שמוצא אבידה נפנה לשם. זה עומד ומכריז, וזה
עומד ונותן סימנין ונוטלה. וזו היא ששנינו: צאו וראו אם נמחת אבן הטוען
Our Rabbis
taught: There was a Stone of Claims in Jerusalem: whoever lost an
article repaired thither, and whoever found an article did likewise. The latter
stood and proclaimed, and the former submitted his identification marks and
received it back. And in reference to this we learnt: Go forth and see whether
the Stone of Claims is covered.
The last line in
the Gemara refers to an incident recorded in the mishnah of Masechet Taanit. There was a drought in Jerusalem and Honi
HaMaagel was asked to pray for rain. His prayer was too successful and the city
was almost covered in a flood. In order to check how high the waters had risen,
the people go went to see if the Stone of Claims was covered, probably because it was a
well-known landmark and also because it was relatively high up.
What makes this
podium a possible candidate to be the אבן הטוען ? It is on the main
street, high up so that everyone would see the speaker, and in a position where
many can see and hear him all up and down the street. Could it be that Uziel
and Szanton have found something that had been lost: a small and fascinating detail about aliya
laregel, pilgrimage to the Temple?




Nice review thank you! I think it most plausible that the podium was in fact the Even HaToein mentioned in the story of Honi HaMeagel.
ReplyDeleteBest,
except for the fact that Honi lived centuries earlier and you would have to assume that the podium was already there in his time
ReplyDeleteThe chronological point is a good one but I don't think we have to assume it is the stone in Honi's story but a similar one, maybe even put in the same place when the street was built. Was there an earlier street in the same place? Do we have evidence of that?
ReplyDeleteThanks very much for the explanation.
ReplyDelete