Posts

Showing posts from November, 2013

Why was the Temple destroyed?

Image
Massechet Yoma, Daf 9  + Throughout Massechet Yoma, we get a glimpse into life with the Beit Hamikdash, the holy Temple, intact. On daf 9, for example, we're told the reasons for the destruction of Jerusalem's holiest place. We read that the first Temple was destroyed because of three cardinal sins - idolatry, adultery and murder. The prophets warn the people of their imminent demise because of these actions - see Jeremiah, chapter 9: "So that I might leave my peopel... for they are all adulterers, a crowd of unfaithful people." The Second Temple, our sages tell us, was destroyed due to unbased hatred among brothers. The Temple authorities were widely perceived as corrupt. Josephus, the first century Jewish historian writing from the Roman court, tells us in his book "The Jewish War" that during the siege of Jerusalem the generals said there's no need to attach the city, the Jews will kill each other..." *** A talented friend and teacher
Image
Shekalim 21 Up the Down Staircase What a beautiful mishna to finish our posts of Shekalim with! The mishna at the beginning of the eighth chapter tells us that if we find vessels in Jerusalem, near the mikve, are they considered pure or impure? Rabbi Meir answers that it depends on where they are found: דרך ירידה לבית הטבילה, טמאין, ודרך עליה טהורין, שלא כירידתן עלייתן. . . Unlike our current inclination to be machmir about things that are unknown, Rabbi Meir says see what information you have and decide based on that. If the vessels are on their way down to the mikve, then clearly they have not been immersed yet and are impure. And if they are on their way up, they have been purified and you should feel free to use them. The mishna assumes that there are two ways to approach the mikve, one going in and one coming out. The commentators understood the basic principle. The Korban HaEdah explains that there was an entrance and an exit to the mikve so that the impure w
Image
Shekalim 19 Cleaning House   In the context of the Gemara’s discussion of the שופרות used for donations to the Temple , the subject of King Yehoash’s method of collecting money arises. As we can see in two parallel sources (Melachim Bet 12 and Divrei haYamim Bet24) Yehoash was disappointed in the collections made by the Kohanim for repairs of the Temple , בדק הבית . He and the Kohen Gadol Yehoyada decided to take matters into their own hands and created the first pushke:     מלכים ב יב: י וַיִּקַּח יְהוֹיָדָע הַכֹּהֵן אֲרוֹן אֶחָד וַיִּקֹּב חֹר בְּדַלְתּוֹ וַיִּתֵּן אֹתוֹ אֵצֶל הַמִּזְבֵּחַ בימין (מִיָּמִין) בְּבוֹא-אִישׁ בֵּית יְהוָה וְנָתְנוּ-שָׁמָּה הַכֹּהֲנִים שֹׁמְרֵי הַסַּף אֶת-כָּל-הַכֶּסֶף הַמּוּבָא בֵית-יְהוָה When the box was full, they would empty it out and use it to pay the craftsmen who did repairs in the Temple . Yehoash ruled in the ninth century BCE, he was a contemporary of the prophet Elisha. Archaeological artifacts from that time period in Israel
Image
Shekalim 18   יופי לך מזבח In the discussion of the mishnah about donations to the Temple , the subject of trees arises. The Gemara wants to understand the size of a tree used on the altar. It concludes that the fire on the altar was one cubit ( אמה ) by one cubit and the trees are sized accordingly. In order to understand which altar the Gemara is referring to, we need to take a look at the different sizes of the altars in history. (We are of course referring to the large altar used for sacrifices, not the מזבח הקטורת .) The first altar was the one built in the desert, for the Tabernacle. Its dimensions were rather small: five cubits by five cubits and three cubits high: שמות כז: א וְעָשִׂיתָ אֶת-הַמִּזְבֵּחַ עֲצֵי שִׁטִּים  חָמֵשׁ אַמּוֹת אֹרֶךְ וְחָמֵשׁ אַמּוֹת רֹחַב רָבוּעַ יִהְיֶה הַמִּזְבֵּחַ וְשָׁלֹשׁ אַמּוֹת קֹמָתוֹ When King Solomon built his altar in the First Temple it was considerably larger: twenty cubits by twenty cubits and ten cubits high. (Note th
Image
Shekalim 14 Limited Time Only: Wine and Oil for your Sacrifice!   It’s always exciting when an archaeological find fits in with history and literary sources, completing a familiar narrative. The find below could actually work with two different stories, depending on how it is interpreted. At the end of 2011, the excavators from the City of David who had been examining the main sewer system below Robinson’s Arch announced a small but momentous discovery. They had found a small stamp, or perhaps a chit, with Hebrew letters on it: As can clearly be seen, the letters read דכא ליה , not Hebrew but Aramaic. The archaeologists interpreted the words to mean טהור לה' , pure to God, a designation that could apply to many of the items used in the Temple . The oil, wine, meal and other food items all had to be pure if they would be used in the Temple . And since the artifact was found right below the Temple Mount , it stands to reason that it labeled an item used in the s