Do clothes really make the man?

By -


Masechet Shabbat, Daf 114
In modern terms, clothes make the man, or so we're told.

Let's take a walk back through time, on our daf today, to remind ourselves what the people of the First Temple period wore, or didn't wear. We are told that people certainly cared how they looked back in those days, adhering to strict fashion standards. They had, we are told on amud aleph, one outfit to wear while stirring a pot of stew, another for pouring wine for their teacher. A mindset, if you will, for proper behavior, as dictated by appropriate clothing.

And what did the prophet Yishayahu, or Isaiah, wear while walking the streets of Jerusalem, in the seventh century BCE -- Why would he, as we are told in chapter 20 verse 3, walk 'naked and barefoot' for three years, risking mockery and worse? Why this emphasis on outer appearance, here in Masechet Shabbat?

A person, especially a prophet, was considered 'out of their mind' if they walked around barefoot. And normally, robes were a status symbol, kept clean and pressed, if not new. Rabbi Yochanan and others try to reconcile this seeming conflicting report by saying that he wore dirty, old clothing. But the literal reading remains (Abarbanel, Rambam), and it's possible that this brave prophet had received a vision of himself  and knew he must present the image and its repercussions with the people of the time - to teach them a lesson. Perhaps the challenge of that time included chastising for lack of modesty, or to teach the need to look beyond appearances, to strengthen or recognize a person's internal values.



This reading gains strength in the next segment on the daf, seemingly unrelated at first but immediately following. Our sages are asked to rule on whether a piece of cloth is 'chotzetz', or acts as interference with mikvah immersion, specifically the small rug usually placed under the saddle of a donkey.

Rashbag says this piece of clothing isn't large enough to interfere until it's the size of an 'Italian Issar' coin. According to Prof Yaacov Meshorer, the ancient coin looks like this: 


The size of the coin is assumed to be the purpose of its inclusion here, as the traditional reading goes. However in this case, upon closer look, one might want to postulate a connection with clothes, by the figure on the back. Roman culture emphasized the person, the body, personal achievement through strength. Humility on the back burner, clothing took center stage and became the window through which the soul was viewed. Perhaps a minimum of cloth provided a modicum of tzniyut, inside and out...

Our sages chose a different emphasis and remind us that the minutiae of the commandments provide us with both halachic and moral guidelines. Unearthing the past might just give us insight into human nature, then and now.






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

By -
Image
Queen for a Day  Nazir 19   Our mishnah is one of the places where we hear about the intriguing figure of Queen Helene or Heleni HaMalka. Here she is described as taking a Nazirite vow while still in the Diaspora, and then having to redo part (or all) of it when she arrives in the land of Israel. Who is Helene, where is she from and what can archaeology tell us about her? We hear about Helene and her sons Monbaz and Izates in a number of places. Josephus, who was almost her contemporary (she probably died when he was a child, in the mid first century CE), writes about the family’s conversion to Judaism. Helene and her husband Monbaz were the rulers of a country called Adiabene or חדייב in Hebrew. It is located on the northern end of the Tigris River, near ancient Nineveh and the Assyrian kingdom. Today it is in northern Iraq, in Kurdistan:   http://womenofhistory.blogspot.co.il/2014/07/queen-helena-of-adiabene.html Adiabene’s location was on a major...
Read more
By -
Image
The Writing on the Wall Shabbat 149 The Gemara here discusses the Mishnah about not reading from a written guest list or menu on Shabbat. Is the concern that you might come to erase something from the list, or that it might lead you to reading material that is inappropiate for Shabbat? In this context, the Gemara discusses a case where the list is written on a wall, and how high the wall is, i.e., whether it will be difficult to erase. Those of us who regularly write out Shabbat menus and guest lists may find this Gemara somewhat strange to say the least. In what civilized home would you write your lists directly on the wall? In this situation, it is helpful to compare our case to one of the few places in the ancient world where the walls and everything on them survived completely intact: Pompeii . The volcanic eruption that buried Pompeii in the year 79 CE preserved the city and all its contents, including those people unlucky enough to not escape in time. As such, Pompeii...
Read more
By -
Image
What’s Cookin’? Shabbat 38 What did our ancestors’ kitchens look like? What are all these terms thrown around in Shabbat and in Menachot: tanur תנור , kirah כירה , kupach קופח , furni פורני ? Are they at all parallel to the baking and cooling appliances we use today? To answer that question I looked at three sources: Zeev and Shmuel Safrai’s Mishnat Eretz Yisrael, Shmuel Avitzur’s encyclopedia of traditional tools אדם ועמלו , and Dr. Rafi Frankel’s comprehensive article on baking in Talmudic time (Catedra 2011, link at bottom of the post). Safrai tells us that unless you were very wealthy, no one in ancient times had a kitchen as we think of it. Not only was most of the preparing, baking and cooking done outside in the communal courtyard (everyone knows what is or isn’t in your pots!) but there rarely were surfaces to work on. The women would squat or sit on the floor and the baking and cooking “appliances” were on the floor too. Safrai gives a short description of a ta...
Read more